Your company has an existing process improvement program,
but you find yourself::
Wondering why improvements do not happen as quickly
as you hoped.
Feeling frustrated that improvements do not really
change your bottom line.
Thinking that you have poured resources into improvement
initiatives without adequate returns.
Asking why improvements don’t “stick.”
Expecting a lot more than you are getting out of your
improvement efforts.
“Pushing” improvement in your organization
without adequate management support, resources or funding.
Your company wants to start a process improvement effort
but is afraid that although considerable costs, time, and resources
will be used, there will be no sustainable gains a few years
down the road.
If you are in either of these situations, you are not alone.
Several recent surveys have shown that while companies still place
a tremendous emphasis on process improvement, only a very small
percentage of organizations systematically pursue and sustain
these efforts over a period of time. All too often, what begins
with a bang fizzles out in a few years with clearly demonstrable
gains that have not been sustained.
This is because many organizations emphasize the “improvement”
side of process improvement, but not the “management”
side. A process improvement program alone will not produce significant
results that affect the company’s bottom line or its competitive
position without the continued support and guidance of leaders
who ensure that the focus of the program remains on areas of strategic
importance. Similarly, improved processes will not remain improved
by themselves without a systematic effort to sustain them. Without
such oversight, entropy takes over and the even the best performance
improvement program will stall or regress.
Our process management methodology is designed to combat the
effects of entropy in your organization. Whether your organization
is well on its way in its process improvement journey or is just
testing the waters, you need process management. Our process management
approach is completely integrated with our world-renowned Six
Sigma offering, but it focuses on filling the “missing ingredients”
that often make the difference between the truly transformational
process improvement programs and those that are only marginally
successful.
The STAT-A-MATRIX process management model has the
five components shown in the accompanying chart. Based on your
needs, we can either bring specific aspects of the model to your
organization as a series of targeted workshops and training sessions,
or we can help you implement the entire model from scratch. Explore
our full range of training
and consulting options.
The Performance Gap
Many organizations experience a gap between their expectations
from process improvement activities and the actual realization
of those efforts. This gap is depicted in the accompanying
graph. Our process management methodology is designed
to close that gap.
Missing Ingredients
The “missing ingredients” are the most common
reasons why process improvement initiatives don’t
live up to their promise. Common “missing ingredients”
include :
The wrong projects get worked on.
Business metrics are plentiful but
are not connected to the bottom line.
Improvement teams work in isolated
pockets and are disconnected with business strategy.
There are no tools or methods to
sustain improvements.
Leadership roles to support performance
improvement initiatives are not clearly defined.
There is no governance structure
to assess and promote the ongoing health of the improvement
effort.
Do these ingredients exist in your organization? Our
process management approach can help you identify the
ones that are most critical for your organization, and
how you can work to fix them.
Model Components
Each component of our process management model addresses
one aspect of what your organization needs in order
to maximize the benefits of your process improvement
efforts. Our approach helps you to:
Align process improvement
activities with business strategy.
Design the processes,
metrics, and structure needed to support improvements.
Operate in a way
that clearly identifies performance gaps and improvement
priorities.
Improve using a
variety of methods and tools.
Sustain improvements
through communications and sharing.
Findings From Surveys
“… less than 16% of “Six Sigma”
companies and less than 8% of all respondents are holding
true to the rigorous program with the stringent quality
goal, structured problem-solving approach, dedicated
training and prioritized projects that are the hallmark
of the original Six Sigma philosophy …”
Aberdeen Group Lean Six Sigma Benchmark Study,
2006